Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: whirlwind dreamer 65-95 Date: Mar 31, 2009 5:44am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM

tittie's and beer!! tittties an beer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwb1s1DYnDU g- morning rasta!! enjoy!!! wwd

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: rastamon Date: Mar 31, 2009 5:58am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM

and a good morning to you! (all and any female milk sacks are so VERY overated, except if you're 1-2yrs old)


Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Finster Baby Date: Mar 31, 2009 6:18am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM

I believe the saying is "Football, Titties and Beer, oh my".....:-)

Titties aside....that is a very pretty girl...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Mar 31, 2009 6:48am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM

Alright, what's going on here?

What if Miss D pops over? Hmmm--do web sites possess "directionality"? Since she is over there and we are here I mean...? Not sure.

Anyway, it seems somehow especially juvenile and sexist, and though I participated in the ooogling of JAlba, well...okay...damn it.

I dunno. But really...what is the point? At least Alba had a point in the context of the moment...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Mar 31, 2009 7:03am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM

Meaghan Fox would have been better :)



(hope Marie isnt reading this one - lol)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: user unknown Date: Mar 31, 2009 9:07am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM

Meagan Fox

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: direwolf0701 Date: Mar 31, 2009 9:16am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM

bill, you are a true friend :)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: user unknown Date: Mar 31, 2009 9:20am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: big smiles PICTURE IS R RATED IF CHILDREN ARE IN THE ROOM

Photobucket

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: dead-head_Monte Date: Mar 31, 2009 9:12am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: re: what is going on here? I'm addicted to Sugaree!

8888.jpg

fyi — this doc is located directly above the log-in box when you "join us"

The Internet Archive Terms of Use — 10 March 2001 — 3rd Paragraph

Some of the content available through the Archive may be governed by local, national, and/or international laws and regulations, and your use of such content is solely at your own risk. You agree to abide by all applicable laws and regulations, including intellectual property laws, in connection with your use of the Archive. In particular, you certify that your use of any part of the Archive's Collections will be noncommercial and will be limited to noninfringing or fair use under copyright law. In using the Archive's site, Collections, and/or services, you further agree (a) not to violate anyone's rights of privacy, (b) not to act in any way that might give rise to civil or criminal liability, (c) not to use or attempt to use another person's password, (d) not to collect or store personal data about anyone, (e) not to infringe any copyright, trademark, patent, or other proprietary rights of any person, (f) not to transmit or facilitate the transmission of unsolicited email ("spam"), (g) not to harass, threaten, or otherwise annoy anyone, and (h) not to act in any way that might be harmful to minors, including, without limitation, transmitting or facilitating the transmission of child pornography, which is prohibited by federal law and may be reported to the authorities should it be discovered by the Archive.

I believe we have a huge amount of priveleges here
how about re-visiting Anchorage
for this Sugaree beauty
gratefulless-dude.jpg

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: user unknown Date: Mar 31, 2009 5:07pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: re: what is going on here? I'm addicted to Sugaree!

Monte you highlighted the section referring to child pornography. Sure you are not suggesting the picture in question is of an underage girl. I have learned that one must be very careful when using the word child in conjunction with the word pornography. That combination tends to bring the "witch burners" out of the woodwork. Now don't get me wrong were this truly a case of "kiddie porn", I would be the man lighting the torches.

Well I guess I just violated section G of the IA ToU. Sorry to be annoying, but I have witnessed the "feeding frenzy" the inacurate use of the term "child pornography" can create. And believe me, it IS NOT pretty.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: rastamon Date: Mar 31, 2009 6:26pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: re: what is going on here? I'm addicted to Sugaree!

uuuuhhh...so i take it, she's under 18?? (the sugaree beauty)
well, i won't be fooled again!

"She was fifteen years old, going on thirty-five, Doc, and she told me she was eighteen, she was very willing, I practically had to take to sewing my pants shut. Between you and me, uh, she might have been fifteen, but when you get that little red beaver right up there in front of you, I don't think it's crazy at all and I don't think you do either. No man alive could resist that, and that's why I got into jail to begin with. And now they're telling me I'm crazy over here because I don't sit there like a goddamn vegetable. Don't make a bit of sense to me. If that's what being crazy is, then I'm senseless, out of it, gone-down-the-road, wacko. But no more, no less, that's it".

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: user unknown Date: Mar 31, 2009 6:45pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: re: what is going on here? I'm addicted to Sugaree!

No rasta, the "Sugaree beauty" is definitely of legal age. I am sure Monte would not have posted her picture if she weren't. However it seemed as if Monte was accusing GFY of posting an underage girl(the "Big Smile" girl...you know, the one with titties). I don't think she is underage either, but I have been wrong about those things before. I was more concerned with the (hopefully)erroneous "child pornography" reference.